February - March 2007
Problems of Small Cinema
The Media is expanding, it is knocking all geographical boundaries .It has become
a huge industry. Cinema is a part of this media and still there is a kind of
cinema, which is finding it difficult to find a place in this industry. Mainstream
Cinema is prevalent in all parts of the globe. Business interests are more
important than the content and artistic expression here. That leaves serious
cinema grasping for breath.
This is not the case of only Indian regional cinema, but many “small
cinemas” are facing similar hurdles. The plight of regional and small
cinema came to fore in the 37th International Film Festival of India, held
in Goa in November-December 2006
It is a known fact that India is the largest film producing country in the
world. The number is staggering, around 900 films every year. Films in India
are made in many languages. Hindi film industry is prominent and dominent,
more visible worldover. But that is not “the” or “only” Indian
Besides Mumbai, the home of Hindi cinema, there are four major film production
centres, they are in the southern part of India.Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh-Telugu
language films), Bangalore (Karnataka-Kannada films), Chennai (erstwhile Madras-Tamilnadu-Tamil
language films) and Tiruvananthapuram, erstwhile Trivandrum-Malyalam language
films). Each region produces around 150 films per year. Apart from these states
there is West Bengal, which is another important film, producing state (Bengali
films, centre is Kolkatta erstwhile Calcutta) and Maharashtra.Though Mumbai
is the capital city of Maharashtra, the state need separate mention for its
Marathi language films. Maharashtra is the birthplace of Indian cinema.
Bengali and Marathi films are known for their artistic quality and experimentation
(now sporadic instances). Of course, both Cinemas have their share of Mainstream
or ‘commercial’ films too. Once Bengali and Marathi films dominated
Indian cinema, are now reduced to ‘regional cinema’. South Indian
films do very good business in all four states. Roughly 150 films are made
in each language per year. They have their own Super Stars, Star directors,
and these films rake in millions of Rupees. Yet this industry is called as ‘regional’ cinema.
Their visibility is limited, that is one and main reason, which hinders growth
of this cinema. One hardly sees Tamil or Malayalam film outside their respective
state. South Indian films at least enjoy great following and patronage in their
states but even smaller regional cinema is unlucky in this respect also. Take
for example Assamees cinema. Assam is a small northeastern state. It is experiencing
political turmoil, plagued by extremists’ attacks for decades together.
Still there are few filmmakers who want to say something through their films.
But who will watch a film in Assamee language out side Assam? Hindi films are ‘prohibited’ there
as per the “decree’ of extremists. Due to ‘agitations’ and
threats by extremist outfits, Cinema halls or theatres are being closed down.
So they do not find place to exhibit their work even in their own state. How
can this regional cinema will flourish under such circumstances?
May it be Assamee or Marathi or any other regional cinema, they are not seen
out side their state is main concern of filmmakers. Availability of exhibition
centres or theaters and raising finance for the project are other problems.
Now competition is getting tougher even more. Hollywood films are being dubbed
in to regional languages, Hindi films are flooding the limited market with
hundreds of prints. Situation is serious in states other than southern states.
Now multiplexes have helped Marathi cinema to a certain extent, but that is
an urban scenario. Films have to be seen in rural areas to make a decent earning.
Problems faced by regional cinema in India and by small cinema of the world
are not much different. Film industries in Finland and many European countries
and New Zealand are ‘tiny’ compared to Hindi film industry alone,
forget total Indian Film industry. Again New Zealand’s film industry
can be termed as ‘big’ compared to that of film production activities
of small nations.
Sarah Cantell of Finland was in Panaji for IFFI .Her film ‘Unna and Nuuk’was
a part of Cinema of the World. According to her less than 10 films are made
in Finland. Exhibiting them outside Finland has problem due to language barrier.
People engaged in film business-whether actors, directors, or technicians-have
to work with TV to support them. American or Hollywood movies eat the major
chunk of revenue, which is limited because of its population of approximately
5 million people. Europe has a system of funding film production, yet it is
very difficult for filmmakers there to make films, which will be talked about
in the world. Because, unless they are seen who will discuss them?
New Zealand came to fore with “Piano” few years back. Now we know
it, thanks to the “Lord of the Ring” trilogy. But They do not have
large production houses like India or USA. Independent filmmakers have to rely
upon support of the Film Commission. Very few know about their films outside
Pacific region. But still, film industry of New Zealand is thriving mainly
because of joint productions. American film studios come to New Zealand with
big budget films. They offer good money to crew members. Naturally local filmmakers
find it difficult to get a cameraman or any technician who can fit their modest
budget. Though New Zealand’s films are made in English language they
can’t find global audience
Mainstream cinema may be good for commerce but small cinema is more
important. Because it has different stories to tell. Stories about simple,
non-glamorous human beings living in all parts of the world. Their hopes and
frustration, Their struggle to survive. These are universal themes. Told
in; sometimes simple sometimes complex way; yet the expression is artistic.
This cinema comes from a culture and tells us something about that culture.
This cinema needs to survive. For that, it needs support, from local and national
governments and people also. There is an urgent need to spread awareness
about ‘good’ cinema. Film culture should be nurtured through film
society movement. We need ‘cinephiles’ to support small cinema.
And this must happen fast before this alternative, small cinema becomes a thing
of the past.
More articles by Nikhil Gajendragadkar
Return to February - March 2007 contents